Alesha Reynolds
Professor Paudel
English 102
3 February 2015
Writing
in the Medical Field
In college, a lot of writing is involved no matter what
area of study you are involved in. Whether its essays for an English course,
reports from a biology course, or simply just taking notes in class, writing is
always a big part of earning your degree. Although this is all true, I have
never stopped to think about how much writing I will be doing once I have my
career. Studying the medical field means there are numerous jobs I could have.
I could be a pharmacist, a nurse, or even a surgeon. Surprisingly, writing is
very important in the medical field.
According to owl.english.purdue.edu, “Medical writing is an interdisciplinary field that applies
knowledge of both rhetoric and science to enhance reader understanding of
medical phenomena.” The main purpose of medical writing is to get information
out whether it is to the public, or to another doctor. “Nevertheless, nearly
all medical writers share a like-minded value: to articulate medical
information to their readers in the most effective ways possible,” according to
owl.english.purdue.edu. Medical writers have to take important information that
uses medical terminology, and put it into terms that the everyday reader can
understand. Unless you’re studying in the medical field, it is almost
impossible to understand the terminology doctor’s use, so it is very important
that they are efficient in their writing skills and translating important
information.
An example
of translating information for the public is:
Before
Desensitization (converse of secondary
sensitization) is distinguished from habituation (converse of primary
sensitization) by the explicit expression of memory rebound and recovery
effects in the post-stimulation response.
After
"In the study, Poon and his colleagues use
two types of nonassociative learning called habituation and desensitization to
promote a better patient-ventilator interaction. Habituation refers to a
person's decrease in responsiveness to a repeated stimulus. In terms of the
fireworks example, you may learn to successfully "block out" or
become more accustomed to the loud, recurring noises over time. On the other
hand, desensitization is a person's diminished response to a second stimulus as
a result of the first stimulus. For instance, if you became more accustomed to
the loud fireworks through repeated sounds, your ability to hear other noises
might have decreased, too."
In the “before” statement, the information being
presented was unclear and too hard for me to understand. Once translated into
everyday terminology, I could better understand the information and use this
information.
An
example of non-academic source for medical writing would be Health &
Fitness articles in the LA Times magazine.
These articles talk about ways to stay mentally and physically healthy. The
research and studies done to know how to do so, are performed by persons in the
medical field who have made their discoveries into a readable magazine article.
- While talking to my local pharmacist, she says there are a few things you need to know when writing in the medical field.
- Taking medical jargon and translating into readable material for someone not educated in the medical field.
- Know what you are talking about! You have to know every specific fact and scenario to write accurately.
·
Knowing what facts are important and the most up to date.
“If you know how to
relate to your reader, it will help you become better in your career. You will
not only know how to write more effectively, but also speak to clients or
customers more effectively as well,” says my local pharmacist. The New England Journal of Medicine is
an example of academic medical writing. The journal has articles about topics
happening in the medical field today. This journal is getting medical
information out to the public.
When it comes to how much you will write in your career in the
medical field, it will vary. While talking to my childhood pediatrician, he
says that he very seldom writes a lot of information at one time. He can write
down symptoms of his patients and also write down prescriptions, but he has
never had to write a journal or article that would be posted for the public.
According to owl.english.purdue.edu, “Biostatistics, journalism, medicine,
English, public health, and pharmacy are fields that most medical writers tend
to consult regularly.” This meaning that my pharmacist might write more
regularly than my pediatrician.
Writing skills are very
important. Some areas of study will require more writing than others, but
writing is key to getting information out to the public. If you are interested
in the medical field, just remember that not everyone who reads your material
will know exactly what you are trying to say unless you make your information
readable and reliable.
Work Cited
Ardough, Brent. "Medical Writing." Purdue Owl. N.p., 25 June 2012.
Web. 2 Feb. 2015.
Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2015.
"The New England Journal of
Medicine." New England
Journal of Medicine. N.p., n.d. Web. 02
Feb.
2015.
The introduction flowed well and I could see a clear thesis statement made. This is a good set up for the rest of the paper. The in text citations could be improved and probably better introduced. Also, there isn't a very good description of how the sources relate to the main point. The idea that people in the medical field must be able to understand terminology and simplify it for their patients is well-explained and good main idea, but it is kind of the only main idea. You could probably add at least one more. There is a clear purpose introduced in the beginning of identifying what it's like to write in this profession and the difficulties one may face while doing it. The writer needs at least one more source and maybe to better define the sources she has used. One of the sources is explained, but there is no direct quote given from it. Adding a quote here (from LA fitness magazine) could really help improve this paper and give more supporting points and information to back up the statements being made. Also, the interviews are addressed and well summarized, but there isn't much comparison between the two. You could also give some of your opinion on how you thought writing in this field would be compared to how the professionals you interviewed said it would be. Through your interviews you showed that writing in the medical field can even vary from job to job. This is very good, but you could expand on that even more and I think it would make this paper a lot stronger. The works cited page is correctly formatted, however, the in text citations could be stronger. Minor improvements here and there would give this paper a clearer purpose. Overall though, this paper flows well.
ReplyDelete